Jump to content

User talk:Abce2/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of a talk page. Please do not edit it.

RE:While you are gone

[edit]

sure you can! Programmer13TalkWhat I do 02:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC) I don't know what sock puppet first class is. 02:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

...for taking care of this one. Good job Tiderolls 03:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

[edit]

C heers for remo9ving the Vandalism from my talk pageSlatersteven (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

0Neosis

[edit]

I as wondering if I wanted to how would I delete my personal webpages; see my user age to in to find out.--0Neosis (talk) 19:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Logan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Logan | Talk 01:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please satisfy my curiosity..

[edit]

How is Christian loves Mylena a disruptive user name? T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 02:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noted on UAA. Again, in hindsight I'm not sure if I'm correct. Abce2|AccessDenied 02:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your reply on UAA, perhaps it actually is Christian and he does, in fact, love Mylena? When I was around 14 or 15 I can recall having a screen name declaring my love for someone. Just something to think about. T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 02:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry. It's 10:00 PM, and I didn't get much sleep, and I'm not thinking strait. I'm going to bed now. Abce2|AccessDenied 03:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, we all make mistakes. Just be more careful in the future. :) T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 03:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just feel as if I'm making too many mistakes. I'm going to take some time off. Abce2|AccessDenied 03:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Creator's Barnstar

[edit]
The Creator of the Barnstar
I loved the toy barnstar. Kayau (talk) 06:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UAA again

[edit]

Not too long ago I noted on making reports of usernames that were not blatant violations of username policy. I wish to re-emphasise the advice myself and other admins have given, in that if there's no contributions (and the name is not blatant), then it's not an immediate issue and thus it shouldn't be at UAA. We must WP:AGF and wedo not speculate on the intentions of a user when considering a block. Nja247 08:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this name could have easily been someone's name. As it's not a blatantly obvious violation, and as there were no contributions to override WP:AGF, it did not belong at UAA.Nja247 08:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm sorry. I didn't get much sleep and it was 10:00. I've got to go, we reply better later. Abce2|AccessDenied 13:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My first article

[edit]

First of all thanks for welcoming to the Wikipedia community:)

I've been working on my first article and I think it's ready to be published. Please take a look at here. Anybody can fix something thats broken, but it take a genius to fix something that working. 13:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the Welcome and the Cookies but I've been here for about a while now but thanks. AlienX2009 (talk) 03:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this may not be important but

[edit]

Answered your post at the talk page for the vandalism patrolDrew Smith What I've done 04:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Cookies...

[edit]

...and the welcome message! Hopefully, I won't have too much trouble figuring out wikipedia. —Precedingunsigned comment added by Wade Alexander (talk •contribs) 05:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

[edit]

Hello Abce2, just wanted to say thank you for your compliment on my user name. I've noticed you like modern Wikipedia templates. You have to getQui. It puts that little status symbol on your userpage, you can also have QuiFriends. It's awesome! Nice, busy user page! :)---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 10:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have Qui? ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 10:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just now or for awhile? ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 10:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, an online admin!

[edit]

Hello, Abce2, how did you find me!? Have you got a link to the page? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that must User:HellinaBucket, I was trying to sort out his archiving issues. I see the Wiki_______ but I think it's supposed to be like that. It seems to me that _______ represents the group of letters added after the word Wiki, i.e. Love, which follows Wiki to form WikiLove; Hate, which follows Wiki to make WikiHate; Crime, which follows Wiki to make WikiCrime; and so on. Why not drop a suggestion on User:Sebwite talk page (he has done most of the work on the template). Cheers, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something in return

[edit]
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Hey, thanks for the potatoes! And of course I feel honored to be on your fame list. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Catgut (talk) 22:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my userpage.--MahaPanta (talk) 04:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck

[edit]

Thank You for your message in my talk page and my sincere apologies for late response.Wish you all the best in the future.I am certain you will be admin and I really very sorry I could not support you at this juncture.But you are on the right track and will be admin for sure in the not so distant future.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar you gave me in May. I was busy with final examinations then, and didn't reply. How impolite of me...Arbiteroftruth Plead Your Case 12:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: xeno's talkpage

[edit]

Hi. I was stalking xeno's talkpage and noticed your discussion with him. I have the account creator flag, so if you're still interested, I can create the account for you if you tell me the name you're looking for. Though, I must echo xeno, if you can't create it, then a vandal can't either. :) Happy editing, -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 19:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Sounds good. -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 21:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This confuses me

[edit]

I'm sorry if my comment was hard to understand. I was just making a friendly reference to your signature about how free lemonade costs 25 cents. Happy editing.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 21:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Prices went up. And thanks!  :)Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 21:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irony strikes?

[edit]

[1] :)Shereth 22:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ft12

[edit]

I appreciate your position, but I'm not sure you're doing the candidate any favours by transcluding and then strongly opposing their doomed RfA. A word of advice and link to WP:NOTNOW might yield better consequences for all concerned. Sincerely,  Skomorokh  23:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Please help me understand what you left on my talk page? 12.97.0.66 (talk) 00:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I understand now

[edit]

Well, Agra has a large importance in the Oklahoma portal. It was once known as queen city but unfortunately documents and such have been lost in a bad tornado back in the early 1900's due to tornadoes in Lincoln county. I guess we can just assume Agra never had an importance. Sorry for the confusion.12.97.0.66 (talk) 00:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

[edit]

I'm sorry your "adminship" approval failed. You seem to be a kind and honorable editor. It's hard in these times to pass RFA approval and many among us are evil in their ways. You are a great editor though and quick to catch things gone wrong. Thank you for your advice and I hope to keep in contact with you. You can find me at mickdotmurphyatlivedotcome. 12.97.0.66 (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Election of general for Vandalism Patrol

[edit]

Hmm... I believe Programmer13 would probably do it on around July 5th or so I'll tell you if I hear anything from him saying otherwise.Monkey FoxContributes! . 01:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Vandal Fighting page.

[edit]

Hmm right now I don't have any suggestions but then again, I'm tired:)so I'm signing off right now I may be back on later though.Monkey FoxContributes! . 02:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New messages bar

[edit]

Hi. Could you please remove the fake new messages bar, per WP:UP? Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 03:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, generally...

[edit]

It's generally around 3-5 months before candidates should run again, but they shouldn't run again until they really have a grasp of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and gain experience in administrative areas. Hope that helps? – (iMatthew • talk) at 12:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abce2, have you thought about looking into admin coaching? That may better prepare you for your next RfA. -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 01:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well that finally makes sense. I was getting Admin coaching and New Admin School mixed up!Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 03:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kdpsssps

[edit]

I'm sorry for the previous blanking, but how is correcting grammatical errors in sub-titles vandalism? I also previously removed the Nice things section in User:DGG's article because, to me, it made no sense. If you had something to say about it, couldn't you have simply said it to me, instead of accusing me of vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdpsssps(talk • contribs) 22:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for removing this guy's attempts. He seems to have a thing with another ed also, & its at ANI. [2] DGG (talk) 01:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newest request

[edit]

is at Talk:Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)#Image. Also you still have the 1973 Charlotte's Web and The Fox and the Hound (novel).Ice Age lover (talk) 23:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this looks like a good edit that was reverted as proxying. Ice Age lover (talk) 00:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abce2 - sure you mean well, but you do realize you are following the requests of a banned sockpuppet, right? -- Collectonian (talk ·contribs) 00:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I feel so stupid! Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 00:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't feel too bad. Its apparently his newest tactic, tricking established editors who aren't familiar with him into doing the things he can't do. --Collectonian (talk ·contribs) 00:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GAHHH!!!Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 00:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't feel bad. We still love ya. I was just coming by to warn you of this little bozo's tactics as of late. He does it again, you let me know. Stiff upper lip, ol' chap!  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, "I'll keep an eye out.Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 13:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my page

[edit]

Where does it say August at? Do you mean my infobox? (Hmmm.... I've never heard of 25¢ free lemonade!) Also, about the box at the top of your page, I think it's apologize no 'S' ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead---03:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In British English, it is indeed apologise. ;) -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 03:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get it, One of my infoboxes is wrong, it says I've been a member for 3 years and a half, other than that, my classification says Autoconfirmed User and my date of membership says the correct date ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead---03:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I get that alot! ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 13:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

inline-4

[edit]

Hi. I could use your support on trying to change this article's title. Before deciding, please read an editor's comment (in several parts) It is listed before my comment at end. ThanksVegavairbob (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Hi74.197.64.226 (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abce2,

Thank you for your nice welcome. This is a whole new world for me, and I can see there's a lot to learn! I'm sure there'll be plenty of questions as the learning process ensues. Thanks for being there.

Best wishes,

PhoenixIsBack PhoenixIsBack (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need help

[edit]

Hey Abce2, I need a little bit of help. How do you make a chart? Write me back on my talk page, billybobbobbilly —Preceding unsigned comment added byBillybobbobbilly (talk • contribs) 15:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Six (film)

[edit]

I see that IMDb lists five movies and a tv miniseries with the title Six. Which one(s) had you in mind? —Tamfang (talk) 21:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, when you tried to add Six (film) to Six. Or was that not you? —Tamfang (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(The real) RE:While you are gone

[edit]

Sorry for the other RE:While you are gone I was in a hurry and had to type really fast. let me get this straight, as a founder, I have no authority over anyone because of it, okay? none! Programmer13TalkWhat I do 11:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page

[edit]

If you'd like to talk to me in private, e-mail me using this link. –CG 00:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Weeliljimmy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Weeliljimmy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An Interesting Observation

[edit]

As I have enough vandal reverts to be a "General of the Vandalism Patrol", maybe you should increase the count a bit? -t'shaelchat 02:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Weeliljimmy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Thanks

[edit]

My pleasure. :) → Dylan620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 14:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biology Barnstar

[edit]

Abce2, please offer the former biology barnstar you created to WikiProject Butterflies and Moths in case they want it. All the best,Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 02:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Both you and User:QuackGuru need to stop reverting each other right now. You are involved in an edit war and will be blocked if you continue. Take this argument to the talk page, and discuss things; neither of you should edit the article directly until a consensus has been reached with other editors. If necessary, try WP:Third opinion.

For what it's worth, I think "co-founder" is the appropriate wording. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 18:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I got confused. Now what is it, the 15th time this kind of thing has happened to me? Oh, well I'm just glad I'm usually a cheerful person and one who tries not to blow up and start yelling. (I'm not talking about anyone)Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 18:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

user talk:NawlinWiki

[edit]

Not when they are an obvious sock. Please note that user:Katrina = Lulz has been blocked indef by J.delanoy for this very reason.-t'shaelchat 23:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm sorry, I don't know as much as you guys do.Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 23:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, no biggie. :) t'shaelchat 23:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's ok to assume good faith, but consider also the fact that User:NawlinWiki is from New Orleans and the new user's name: "Katrina = Lulz". Regards, decltype (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's the fifth time I've been told that. I'm thinking that I need to brush up on my Wiki-history. :) Any more socks should know about?Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 23:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, we're in the same boat in that regard. I even adopted a well-known sock once :) decltype (talk) 23:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure of what to say now so I'll say something random in reply. Gorillas. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 23:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Souvik

[edit]

I don't believe that this falls under WP:CSD#A1; see Talk:Souvik. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I knew I messed up something, but I had to leave for something important. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents!(Sign here) 21:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at T'Shael's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vicenarian (T ·C) 23:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Blurpeace's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Oh god I am soooo sorry

[edit]

I just noticed you removed the vandalism that is actually on there!!! I am sooo sorry:( My eyes skipped to the wrong line when I was reading the history

Oh and in reply to your question, what was I talking about... nonesense I guess

--Cityzen451 (talk) 16:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry accusation

[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa November. Feel free to cower in fear. Papa November (talk) 17:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Marco747 from Editing

[edit]

I'll stop this if you unblock Marco747 from editing please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palen647 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock user:Marco747 from editing

[edit]

Can you unblock Marco747 from editing please. —Preceding unsigned comment added byPalen647 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock user:Marco747 from editing second time

[edit]

Please Unblock user:Marco747 from editing. I'm trying to upload an image. From Palen647

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page by this sockpuppet account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Huggle

[edit]

Yeah, I do, though not as often as I used to. I'm not entirely sure about the wine version; as far as I know, it broke during the recent MediaWiki updates, though you might want to ask X! (talk · contribs) about that. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Excuse me

[edit]

Sorry, I don't know how to run Huggle on a Mac, since I don't own one... Until It Sleeps Wake me 20:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

Hello Abce2, you have new messages at: User talk:Spongefrog

That's a home made talkback. Should have posted it a couple of days ago, sorry. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 20:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:July 5 has come and gone

[edit]

Lift me with the new data... What are you talking about! (I probably missed something... stupid me...) Programmer13TalkWhat I do 22:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Fallen" Editors?

[edit]

Not sure what you're trying to imply by that title, but the impression that I get is that Drew R. Smith (talk · contribs) has somehow "fallen from grace" so to speak. What exactly do you mean by the title? -t'shaélchat 23:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me think for a second. I made that title long ago and I'm trying to remeber why I put that. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents!(Sign here) 23:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of Course Not!

[edit]

No I do not think it is laughable, it brings much pain that he is leaving. The exclamation marks were not laughs, but surprise. Monkeyfox and I were both Drew R. Smith's Adoptees. To think that Drew R. Smith's Personal issues is laughable make me wonder about the maturity of the particular person.Programmer13TalkWhat I do 17:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The shadow`s dim pamela carron

[edit]

It's about a book, not a person, but it's a copyvio, so I've tagged it anyway. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a prob.  :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks..

[edit]

for reverting my talk page I figure if I can trigger that kind of nonsense response, whatever admin action he's talking about must have been correct:) DMacks (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at User talk:Programmer13/Vandalism Patrol.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Programmer13TalkWhat I do 22:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you've got mail! (some more) Programmer13TalkWhat I do 22:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]

I am pretty sure that there is not a Barnstar sufficient to reward your sheer bravery in reviewing my userpage when reverting the vandalism on it - so my thanks will need to suffice. Thank you. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

[edit]

Glad you got things straightened out in your personal life. :) Best, t'shaélchat 08:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your sig

[edit]

...is full of crappy code ;)

  • [[User:Abce2|<font face="Fantasy" color="#36F">Abce2</font>]]|<small>[[User Talk:Abce2|<font face="Verdana" color="#09A">''Aww nuts!''</font>]][[User:Abce2/guestbook|<font face="Papyrus" color="#FA1">''Wribbit!(Sign here)''</font>]]</small>
  • [[User:Abce2|<font face="Fantasy" color="#3366FF">Abce2</font>]]|<small>[[User Talk:Abce2|<font face="Verdana" color="#0099AA">''Aww nuts!''</font>]][[User:Abce2/guestbook|<font face="Papyrus" color="#FFAA11">''Wribbit!(Sign here)''</font>]]</small>

The first above is the sig you're using; note the 3-digit values in the color attributes. 3-digit color values are valid in CSS but are invalid inHTML and XHTML. At a minimum you should use the tweaked version I give second above. The font-element is deprecated, too, and really should not be used anywhere on the planet ;) It would be far better if you cut all the silliness, but that's not a code or policy issue. I disapprove of such sigs. Cheers, Jack Merridew 10:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like my new sig that much. Abce2 (talk) 12:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So go back to your old one. t'shaélchat 12:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you can't please everyone.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 12:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hans blocked

[edit]

Saw your post on his talk. Decided to block him for a month even before I saw my name on the list. :-) --SarekOfVulcan(talk) 12:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand what you mean

[edit]

I dont understand waht you mean? I did not own Carl Gerard i only created the stub article on him. is that against the rules now too??? Smith Jones (talk) 15:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please consider revisitng the actual text which you helpfuly cquoted on my talk page. my intent in posting that was to invite users who folowed the link that i placed in the main body (the tag invisting users to expand) to discuss potential aditions which may be controversial or to seek help from the wider comuntiy in finding a larger body of sources that we may consider for inclsuion. i am still baffled and bemused as to how this constitutesWP:OWN since i am not exerting anymore influence over this article than anyone else ever influences over any oth
i see your point and iat my earliest conveinence I will go back and rewite the segment so that it makes a little more senses. sorry ig uess i have spent so many hours working on that article that i forgot to make my talkpage on that aritcle clearer and easier to understand. THANKS for bringing to me attention and happy editing! Smith Jones (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Blurpeace's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–blurpeace (talk) 22:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Blurpeace's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–blurpeace (talk) 22:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a reversion that you made

[edit]

Abce2, you reverted an edit on the centrifugal force page by an anonymous editor with an IP number beginning with 72 and you claimed that their actions had been identified as vandalism. In actual fact, that editor was restoring edits which I had originally made and which editor FyzixFighter had deleted. Take a closer look at the details. My edit involved trimming some excesses in the introduction which I considered to be unnecessary and merely confusing the issue. FyzixFighter was trying to tell us that there are three kinds of centrifugal force. Another of my edits involved expanding a comparative table to cater for the third kind. And my most important edit was actually written by Brews ohare. It was a short concise section illustrating centrifugal force in the context of planetary orbits.

The question that you should really have been asking is why FyzixFighter chose to delete my edits in the first place. An anonymous restored them and you came along and reverted again on the grounds that the actions of the anonymous were identified as vandalism. I don't know how you arrived at that conclusion. That anonymous occasionally gets involved in the centrifugal force debate. On this occasion, he or she was assisting my case. David Tombe (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I don't remeber touching that page.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

Ruh Roh Rorge!!!!! The Secret Police have accused me of breaking Public Directive 10-289, plus its subsections related to the "Equalization of Wikipedia Opportunity" act, and the "Anti-Anti-Questioning-What-You're-Told" act... This place is a joke. Abce2, I think you breathed wrong, I might just report you... --Barwick (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: WebHamster

[edit]

I thought you might want to "certify" this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/WebHamster

Noloop (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have endorsed your summary but I haven't certified it yet.--The LegendarySky Attacker 03:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

[edit]

Hi Abce2, if you would like me to adopt you, create an adoption page at User:Abce2/Adoption, on the other hand, if you want someone else to adopt you, go back to the adoption page. SpinningSpark 19:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The idea was just to let me know you were interested by creating the page. Write anything on it, once it exists we can start a program, but you might want to start by saying what kind of stuff you want to write on Wikipedia. SpinningSpark 22:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem...

[edit]

You moved one of /my/ pieces on the board, not one of yours. Sort of my fault, I sort of mixed up whose pieces are whose... Anyways, I reverted back to newportm's version, because he also happened to make a mistake that I happened to miss until after I made my move... Until It Sleeps Wake me 19:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NODRAMA reminder

[edit]

Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 21:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page numbers in references

[edit]

In answer to your question, most people format references as shown in WP:Cite#Footnote system. The important thing is to get the references into the article. The formatting can always be tweaked later if necessary. SpinningSpark 19:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philip DeFranco

[edit]

IP was already issued final warning and reported at AIV though thanks for reverting. - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 22:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good question

[edit]

BF has been mercifully quiet as of late, but if he does in fact target any of the Ice Age movie articles, he'll be easy enough to spot. I'm on a wikibreak, so I might not catch him right away. If you suspect him, leave word on the WP:ANI page. You can reprt him to the vandalism-in-progress page as well. With any luck, our "deer" little BF has finally gotten the message and we are unlikely to see him again. If we do, it'll be on a limited basis since all of his pet articles are protected. Thanks for letting me know. I'll try and keep an eye on things as well. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

[edit]

I just happened to see that "d" hanging around and looking lost so I thought I'd set it free. :) Shinerunner (talk) 02:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fly away d, fly away to your parents.:)Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 02:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

I wasn't going to answer you until the Dramaout is over, but because you believe it would be helpful if I answered the question, and since I see no reason why an answer should cause any drama, an editor in good standing whose editing is disrupted by unrelated blocks or firewalls may be granted IP-block exemption, which allows editing on an otherwise-blocked IP address. The right is given exceptionally only for good reasons, and may be removed if concerns arise or when it is no longer needed. It is a long and complicated story how I got it, but does that answer your question?--The LegendarySky Attacker 09:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Thanks for answering!Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 17:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!

[edit]

Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:

  • T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
  • WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
  • WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
  • WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
  • WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32.talk.sayno to drama 02:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! It's over! <sob> Oh, well, time to remove the template from the top of my talk page.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 02:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't mean you havta stop working on articles, you know? --Jayron32 03:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC
I know,I was just purposely being over-dramatic.:)Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 15:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New section

[edit]

I haven't replaced anything, I just wrote a comment on the talk page. And I'm quite calm. I think this matter was handled poorly, and I'm expressing that fact. But I appreciate your input. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fight the bias (talk • contribs) 04:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're talking about - on the article page, or the discussion? I haven't touched the article page since we got into the argument, and I'm sure during the course of the edit fighting (which I was the only person to attempt to stop) some things got overwritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fight the bias (talk • contribs) 04:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it's clear that he won't give a real answer. Do you not find it suspicious that the entire discussion page for the article appears to be people arguing with Xenophrenic over the 'proper' content? One can infer his reasons from the tone of his replies. Why would one person be allowed so much authority over a Wikipedia article, and what (innocent) reason would he/she have for wanting that control? —Precedingunsigned comment added by Fight the bias (talk •contribs) 04:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

[edit]

Your report for User:Discounttenniswarehouse would have been best placed at WP:UAA. No worries, just so ya know. Nja247 17:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Americanism

[edit]

I don't think you looked closely at what you reverted to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Americanism&diff=304156465&oldid=304141626

I didn't revert Blippy. I saved his reversion of my edits of yesterday. I reverted to a version that existed before WebHamster and SlaterSteven started edit warring. The only difference was some recently added material by a random editor that was never discussed on the Talk page. Please review the edit history, and undo your change. Again, I didn't revert to my recent edits. Noloop (talk) 18:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...the edit seems to have references, fits the defintion of Anti-Americanism, what's wrong with it?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


What's wrong with it, without even looking closely, is that it calls things anti-American. Calling things anti-American is a political interpretation, therefore not something Wikipedia should do. In any case, the editor has never explained or defended the edits on the Talk page, and in fact never edited the article before or since, as far as I can tell. That version isn't my preferred version of the main paragraph we've been disputing. I reverted to it so we could start working from a minimally disputed version, not "my" version. Please undo your revert: I was trying to return to minimally disputed version. Noloop (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A heads up Abce2. It might pay to read Noloop's new comment on Talk:Anti-Americanism#Stop--The LegendarySky Attacker 01:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Abcde2, thanks for your comment (& cookie :-) on my talk page. Sorry to hear you've had a difficult time recently. I know sometimes life can throw you a curve ball so I just wanted to wish you all the best & hope being a guardian works out well for you. Please find below a (virtual) cookie which, though not quite so nutritious as a real cookie, is just to say good luck:

Paul.rogers.1964 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with{{subst:munch}}!

Paul.rogers.1964 (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you so much for reverting the vandalism on my user page! (and many times too!). Much appreciated. Cya around Wikipedia! Netalarm 07:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UAA and username policy update

[edit]

Just letting you and other editors who do a lot of listings at UAA know that the username policy has underwent some changes as of yesterday. Further the instructions for reports at UAA has been updated to reflect current policy. You may wish to look those over at your convenience. Cheers, Nja247 09:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 07:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Please help me!

[edit]

This is Gnmng Jreck. I've been blocked! And I'm not even a sockpuppet! Or anykind of puppet! Please help!66.206.233.143 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

User:Sinebot —Preceding unsigned comment added by66.206.233.143 (talk) 22:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pretties for you

[edit]
The Sandwich of Exceptional Excellence (Potato Salad of Congenitality cluster, 1st. Class) In Panis, Veritas.

With all due solemnity (which is to say none at all!), I award you this prestigious sandwich, for the great work I've seen you do since you posted to my page back in the spring. Keep up the good work, O noble WikiWarrior! Wear this sandwich with all the pride it deserves! Best Regards,Hamster Sandwich (talk) 00:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You.

[edit]
Hello, Abce2. You have new messages at Kjnelan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SPI case

[edit]

I made an SPI case for the latest Bambifan IP socks, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bambifan101. Momo san Gespräch 19:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I completely forgot about doing that. Looks like Bambifan is going to have a lot of places where he can use a computer, since he has stated that he is with his grandmother.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 19:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

80's Music

[edit]

Hi! I reverted your reversion on 80's Music. The anon's edit wasn't vandalism; the page was redundant to 1980s in music. Happy editing! --[midnight comet] [talk] 18:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my finger sliped. :)Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gypsy

[edit]

I assume that these two edits were a mistake: [3],[4] --PBS (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, I guess Twinkle got a little confused. Sorry about that.18:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

[edit]

Thank you for the revert on my talk page, that attack was truly obscene. --Jeremy (blah blah •I did it!) 23:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

user talk:68.50.169.192

[edit]

Users, even anonymous ones, are allowed to remove warnings off their talk pages. Reverting them, as you didhere is generally frowned upon. Thanks, →javért stargaze 23:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the user was removing a block for a month issued 13 days ago. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 03:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Fair enough. →javért stargaze 03:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.03:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abce2/Archive_3&oldid=1094730230"